How to solve casteism

3 03 2007

Caste is possibly India’s biggest embarrassment on the world stage. A majority of the population of India do not even acknowledge this to be a problem. What’s wrong with caste, they would ask.

People try to justify casteism with all kinds of theories. The much-popularized notion (in the western countries) is that the karma-philosophy has been used to justify caste (one is born into a low caste based on one’s deeds in the past life). But in the current age, this is no longer true. The crimes of casteism do not stem from a philosophical debate, but from more basal instincts of man. A more popular theory (in India) is that lower castes tend to be unclean, and thus deserve to be seggregated. This is a dangerously misleading argument which stinks of racism.

Cleanliness had been used as an argument from the very ancient days to justify racial domination. The Romans applied it against their slaves, the French aristocracy applied it against the bourgeoisie, and the Nazis applied it againts the Jews. The Britishers applied it against all the Indians when they were colonizing them. Remnants of these feelings can be observed even now in fiction and in films. So, it now feels absolutely sick when one Indian applies this argument on another.

Caste is now understood to be a social problem, and not as an economic problem which could be expressible by the terms of class. Going by this understanding, the constitution of India provides special privileges to the disadvantaged castes in the name of affirmative action. People from the so-called lower-castes find it easier to secure admissions to universities for pursuing professional education. They also have protected quotas of employment in the public sector. India does not have a functioning welfare state which caters to the economically disadvantaged strata of the society. It is in this scenario that the principles of affirmative action are applied in the name of social justice. Curiously though, the criteria for availing these opportunities depends on the nature of one’s birth, i.e, which caste one has been born into.

However, as it can be seen clearly, 60 years of these policies have done nothing to improve the plight of the lower-castes in India. Routinely, the newspapers report about caste-related murders and public humiliations. The attitude of caste-superiority is firmly entrentched in the minds of even the educated middle class of India. Why is this so ?

I would like to argue that the problem of the caste stems primarily from racism. As long as the root of the problem is not attacked, one would never reach a solution. The social and economic aspects of caste are just symptoms of a deeper disease which is racism. In crude terms, racism can be defined as the stereotyping a person based only on the information related to one’s birth. Caste fits exactly into this particular definition.

When we acknowledge that the problem lies with racism, we have to accept that the only true solution that can be offered is that of deleting the very notion of race. This is probably hard to implement in the global circumstances, but can very well be achieved in India.

Whether they like it or not, Indians are a completely mixed race. So, it is ridiculous for them to continue with the ancient customs of racial seggregation. The only solution to racism (caste) lies in discouraging within-caste marriages.

Please notice that I am not just saying inter-caste marriages should be encouraged. This is true. But apart from this, a viable solution needs to have a definite element of discouraging within-caste marriages. This type of discouragement can be manifest in the form of higher taxes. Couples belonging to the same caste and begetting more than one offspring would need to pay a higher tax. Since India is facing an acute problem of population explosion, one could achieve a dual solution thus.

There are people who argue that the caste system had its own virtues. Brahmins, the educated class, were the most respected. The warrior-class who protected the sovereignity of the country were also very respected. The merchant-class who were the backbone of the economic system were also given due respect. These values can indeed be considered as part of the cultural values of India. However, they immediately get corrupted when coupled with racism. The entire problem of caste in India was with the determination of one’s identity by one’s birth. Detached from this stigma, the cultural values of India could indeed be upheld. People who obtain PhDs would be the new Brahmins. People who serve in the army would be the new Kshatriyas. People who make business executives would become the new Vaishyas. The government can indeed provide tax benifits to these people as a way of encouragement.

If these policies are implemented, one can say confidently that the problem of casteism would disappear from India within 25 years. Otherwise, it would continue to persist. The caste-based identity would continue to damage any notions of nationalist or linguistic identity of the person, thereby causing great harm to the cultural rejuvenation of India.

The solutions of affirmative action (social) and welfare state (economic) can augment the above strategy for a reasonable and fixed amount of time, such as 25 years. The problem of racial divide in India demands urgent attention from the policy-makers to provide a fixed timeframe solution. I would like to make an appeal to all the people from disadvantaged castes in India. “Please get conscious and fight for a real strategy – a strategy that will redeem the situation from the abject racism that sorrounds you now. Don’t be lulled into a complacency just by a package of reservations. They would solve none of your problems.”


Actions

Information

5 responses

6 03 2007
pktyagi

“Please get conscious and fight for a real strategy – a strategy that will redeem the situation from the abject racism that sorrounds you now.”

The solution you offered is precisely the ‘problem’. How can Casteism or race be destroyed by the those who are disadvantaged? Is it in their ‘control’ not to be discriminated?

It seems you are only against ‘reservation’ as it may seem encroachment to your self interests. But don’t forget that it may be the only route available to them at all….in saying this I am not advocating more reservation, but simply pointing out the gross neglect of other ‘avenues’ leaving ‘caste’ as just State responsibility.

Inter-caste marriages as you suggested is one such way where the society can signal that ‘caste no longer matter’…but no…even the most educated among us will not venture that path and ironically…blame lack of education (hence advocate it as solution) for continued disadvantages faced by many castes.

‘Identity politics’ is such a response to the general apathy of the priviledged. It may get more stronger and divisive unless some conscious efforts are not made to ameliorate the existing inequalitis.

The current strategy to overcome such demands in different countries is to encourage diversity in public spheres, ensuring equality of opportunity, redistributive and inclusive policies etc.

How can we create a positive ’signal’ by raising the banner of ‘anti-reservation’ on one hand while ‘not doing’ anything to remove caste prejudices on the other?

It is a relational concept, those who are

6 03 2007
kiran

Hi Tyagi
You misunderstood my position. I didn’t say that reservations should go away. Infact, I have said that they should continue along with other social/economic welfare projects being organized by the government. What I said was that they are not sufficient.

I didn’t say that intercaste marriages should be encouraged. I took that for granted. What I said was that within caste marriages should be discouraged

This sounds so radical that I might be even considered as an extremist. I am pretty sure that none of the forward-castes would be jumping in delight to my proposal.

But, I believe that this step is absolutely necessary. I have wanted the discriminated-castes to fight for this regulation, and I believe in the power of these people. India, is after all, a democracy. And the voice of people counts. You seem to have a patronizing view towards lower-castes. They don’t need any sympathy. They deserve equality and respect. All the rights that they have obtained were through movements and struggle, not out of sympathy.

I do not believe in caste-based identity. You cannot compare the notion of encouraging diversity to caste-based quotas. An identity defined through culture or language has respect. An identity defined through race is debasing. Steps for encouraging diversity should be held in the context of culture and language.

Race is a hurdle that needs to be overcome before one can build a true identity based on culture. I was arguing precisely for this direction.

By the way, I don’t stand to gain anything from abolishing reservation. I have already finished my studies at a highly reputed university in India. I don’t identify myself with my caste (Brahmins) and I may choose to live elsewhere, not settling in India.

7 03 2007
pktyagi

Kiran
I appreciate your courage. I did misunderstood your intention. I agree with you ‘discouraging caste based marriages’ is not only remarkable but a substantive solution to end caste in India. This is the kind of signalling that can remove the roots of identity politics.
Interestingly, it has other implications to the gender issues…personally I have found that among those of my friends who married outside their castes, tend to share a much more egalitarion relationship…I have seen even typical Saas-bahu relations became more accomodating since the ‘cultural role expectation framework’ weakened in such cases. I think this can be empirically tested out…
Are you studying social sciences by any chance?

27 07 2007
santosh Rawar

Yes iam very much agree that we should not discourage the inter caste marriage.well when it comes marriage the only matter for bride is …is groom is capable to take resposibilities of my daughter and he is trustworthy i think dats all matter u cant avoid a marrige onle because of caste problem and air ,water ,sun every natural resourses and thing cant show or mention that we only exit in this earth for higher caste “jab bagwaan ne duniya banate samay koi phed bhaav nahi kiya toh who we are to define and distribute thses thing.
the only matter is “insaan ke karam his/her nature towards all people thts all and v should live life in hope of togetherness not like iam high or iam big …

“hope all the reader will statisfy with my view point ” we should repect our culture our tradition and not to waste time in such thigs which divide our india.

thank you

santosh rawat

8 12 2007
Raghav

Hi All,

I find your blog very informative and also in true spirit. But after reading this particular article iam forced to say this.

The root cause for this caste issue is sadly due to the invasions and not due to Sanathan Dharm. I kindly request you to atleast go through the ‘Manu Smriti’ to get an idea about what actually the rules of society are ment to be.

The reason why we are discussing this is lack of education – by which i mean our original texts not British written History. As Magasthenis mentioned there was no “caste” only “varna”. “Varna” is not caste. And the so called “reformists” tag line ” a person is judged by his doing but not by birth” is as old as the Veda’s themselves.

” STOP LOOKING AT BHARATH USING BRITISH SPECTS”

Leave a comment